Alaska Supreme Court Opinions
Copyright © 1995-4/14/2014 Touch N' Go Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Subject index to Alaska Supreme Court Opinions.
Word Search the Alaska Supreme
Court Opinions
Older Alaska Supreme Court Opinions .
Alaska Appellate Courts' Case Management System
Recent Alaska Supreme Court Opinions
(From 1/1/2014)
- Emma D. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services (4/11/2014) sp-6893
- [Family Law] (termination of parental rights)
- Steward v. State (4/11/2014) sp-6892
- [Procedure, Civil] (discretionary function immunity)
- Regner v. North Star Volunteer Fire Dept., Inc. (4/11/2014) sp-6891
- [Municipal Corporations] (discretionary function immunity-firefighting)
- [Torts] (discretionary function immunity-firefighting)
- Healy Lake Village v. Mt. McKinley Bank (4/11/2014) sp-6890
- [Federal Issues] (jurisdiction; competing tribal election issues)
- [Procedure, Civil] (jurisdiction; competing tribal election issues)
- Sandberg v. Sandberg (4/11/2014) sp-6889
- [Family Law] (Rule 60(b); set aside settlement agreement)
- Hawkins v. Attatayuk (4/11/2014) sp-6888
- [Attorneys and Judges] (cost and fee order even without jurisdiction)
- [Procedure, Civil] (subject matter jurisdiction; pro se pleadings)
- Rude v. Cook Inlet Region, Inc. (4/11/2014) sp-6887
- [Attorneys and Judges] (Rule 68 offers must be in good faith)
- [Business, Commercial/Labor Law] (cumulative voting of shareholder proxies)
- [Procedure, Appellate] (mootness doctrine, exceptions)
- [Procedure, Civil] (Rule 68 offers must be in good faith)
- In Re Necessity for the Hospitalization of Gabriel C. (4/4/2014) sp-6886
- [Constitutional] (due process violation must show prejudice)
- [Procedure, Appellate] (mootness doctrine; exceptions)
- Espeland v. OneWest Bank, FSB (3/28/2014) sp-6885
- [Procedure, Civil] (Rule 60(b)(3), fraud; Rule 56, need affidavits to
avoid summary judgment)
- Zamarello v. Reges (3/28/2014) sp-6884
- [Contracts] (ambiguous contract, integration clause)
- Municipality of Anchorage v. Holleman (3/28/2014) sp-6883
- [Constitutional] (voter referendum)
- [Municipal Corporations] (voter referendum)
- Shumway v. Betty Black Living Trust (3/28/2014) sp-6882
- [Evidence] (Alaska resident, incarcerated elsewhere)
- [Statutory Construction] (Alaska resident, incarcerated elsewhere)
- Rowan B. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services (3/21/2014) sp-6881
- [Family Law] (discovery in CINA cases; “substantial risk of sexual
abuse”)
- Maness v. Gordon (3/21/2014) sp-6880
- [Constitutional] (due process, important vs. fundamental right)
- [Torts] (statute of limitations, discovery rule, repressed
memory syndrome)
- Alaska Community Action on Toxics v. Hartig (3/21/2014) sp-6879
- [Administrative Agencies] (pay for copyvg of agency records)
- [Procedure, Appellate] (mootness doctrine)
- Dennis v. State, Dept. of Administration, Division of Motor Vehicles (3/21/2014) sp-6878
- [Criminal] (calibration tests for breath test instruments)
- Molly O. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services (3/14/2014) sp-6877
- [Family Law] (“Indian custodian” under ICWA)
- Harris v. M-K Rivers (3/14/2014) sp-6876
- [Workers' Compensation] (penalty for bad faith controversion)
- Limeres v. Limeres (3/14/2014) sp-6875
- [Family Law] (defer to trial judge on custody; income averaging
for support order; supervised visitation, valuing marital property)
- ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. v. Williams Alaska Petroleum, Inc. (3/14/2014) sp-6874
- [Attorneys and Judges] (late-filed motions for fees and costs)
- [Contracts] (no mirror image rule under the UCC)
- Szabo v. Municipality of Anchorage (3/7/2014) sp-6873
- [Procedure, Civil] (Guidelines for Rule 60(b)(1),(4),(5), and (6))
- James R. v. Kylie R. (3/7/2014) sp-6872
- [Family Law] (defer to superior court in custody matters; decision
when both parents are equal; use of statutory guidelines)
- Conitz v. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights (3/7/2014) sp-6871
- [Procedure, Appellate] (time to appeal after reconsideration motion)
- [Procedure, Civil] (res judicata; mootness)
- Simone H. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services (3/7/2014) sp-6870
- [Evidence] (Rule 504, psychotherapist privilege)
- Stephanie W. v. Maxwell V. (2/28/2014) sp-6869
- [Family Law] (general rules re: defer to trial court in custody
decisions; good-faith allegations re: parental misconduct)
- Christianson v. Conrad-Houston Insurance (2/21/2014) sp-6868, 318 P3d 390
- [Contracts] (K limitations statute; discovery rule,
malpractice)
- [Procedure, Civil] (K limitations statute; discovery rule,
malpractice)
- [Torts] (K limitations statute; discovery rule,
malpractice)
- McAlpine v. Priddle (2/21/2014) sp-6866
- [Attorneys and Judges] (fee arbitration issues not reviewable)
- BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc. v. State, Dept. of Revenue (2/19/2014) sp-6867
- [Administrative Agencies] (assess property tax, Alaska Pipeline)
- [Municipal Corporations] (assess property tax, Alaska Pipeline)
- Denali Citizens Council v. State, Dept. of Natural Resources (2/14/2014) sp-6865, 318 P3d 380
- [Administrative Agencies] (appeal involving agency expertise)
- [Procedure, Appellate] (appeal involving agency expertise)
- Sagers v. Sackinger (2/14/2014) sp-6864, 318 P3d 860
- [Family Law] (custody issue, trial court discretion)
- [Procedure, Civil] (continuance, trial court has discretion; can’t disqualify
judge based on adverse rulings)
- Coppe v. Bleicher (2/14/2014) sp-6863, 318 P3d 369
- [Procedure, Appellate] (pro se waiver of issue not briefed or raised below)
- [Workers' Compensation] (conflicting medical testimony, defer to Board; pro se
waiver of issue not briefed or raised below)
- In Re Necessity for the Hospitalization of Daniel G. (2/7/2014) sp-6862
- [Administrative Agencies] (ex parte psychiatric evaluation order)
- [Procedure, Civil] (Mootness doctrine, 2 exceptions)
- Welton v. State, Dept. of Corrections (1/3/2014) sp-6861, 315 P3d 1196
- [Procedure, Appellate] (No appeal from a DOC administrative decision, 3
exceptions)
Bright Solutions Inc. in
conjunction with Touch N' Go Systems, Inc. and The
Law Offices of James B. Gottstein are
pleased to present Alaska Supreme Court Opinions.
For more legal resources, visit the
The Alaska Legal Resource Center.
These Opinions were automatically converted to HTML (Hyper-Text Markup Language) format from electronic files provided by the Alaska Court System. Every effort has been made to ensure their accuracy, but neither
Bright Solutions Inc., Touch N' Go Systems, Inc.,
The Alaska Legal Resource Center, nor the Law Offices of James B. Gottstein
are responsible for their accuracy or for any damages arising out of any
possible inaccuracy. If any mistakes are found, please let us know -
E-Mail Us or otherwise contact
Bright Solutions Inc.
| Touch N' Go®, the DeskTop In-and-Out Board makes your office run smoother. Visit
Touch N' Go's Website to see how.
|
|
Bright Solutions is a team of bright, friendly people who specialize in
preventing and resolving computer problems, data recovery and computer
forensics. Their services have proven invaluable to many individuals, utility
companies, medical and legal offices, corporations, government entities and
professional offices all over the nation.
Touch N' Go Systems is a Windows and Windows NT consulting and
software development Company, specializing in:
- Windows and Windows NT environments, including networks.
- Trouble shooting
- Preparation of World-Wide-Web Hypertext documents (Home Pages, etc.)
- Scanning Services
Return to Touch N' Go Systems, Inc. Home Page.
Comments to E-Mail Us
(907) 274-7686
406 G Street Suite, 210
Anchorage, Alaska 99501
fax (907) 274-9493
Copyright 1995-4/14/2014 by Touch N' Go Systems, Inc. No copyright claim is made to the text of the Opinions.
Last Modified 4/14/2014