Alaska Supreme Court Opinions
Copyright © 1995-4/20/2014 Touch N' Go Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Subject index to Alaska Supreme Court Opinions.
Word Search the Alaska Supreme Court Opinions
Older Alaska Supreme Court Opinions .
Alaska Appellate Courts' Case Management System

Recent Alaska Supreme Court Opinions
(From 1/1/2014)

Mattox v. State, Dept. of Corrections (4/18/2014) sp-6896
[Procedure, Civil] (rules regarding summary judgment)
[Torts] (duty owed to inmates; summary judgment not favored on issues of duty)
Kollander v. Kollander (4/18/2014) sp-6895
[Equity] (laches as a defense)
Purcella v. Olive Kathryn Purcella Trust (4/18/2014) sp-6894
[Probate] (reform/terminate irrevocable trust; undue influence)
[Procedure, Appellate] (conflicting facts, defer to trial court)
Emma D. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services (4/11/2014) sp-6893
[Family Law] (termination of parental rights)
Steward v. State (4/11/2014) sp-6892
[Procedure, Civil] (discretionary function immunity)
Regner v. North Star Volunteer Fire Dept., Inc. (4/11/2014) sp-6891
[Municipal Corporations] (discretionary function immunity-firefighting)
[Torts] (discretionary function immunity-firefighting)
Healy Lake Village v. Mt. McKinley Bank (4/11/2014) sp-6890
[Federal Issues] (jurisdiction; competing tribal election issues)
[Procedure, Civil] (jurisdiction; competing tribal election issues)
Sandberg v. Sandberg (4/11/2014) sp-6889
[Family Law] (Rule 60(b); set aside settlement agreement)
Hawkins v. Attatayuk (4/11/2014) sp-6888
[Attorneys and Judges] (cost and fee order even without jurisdiction)
[Procedure, Civil] (subject matter jurisdiction; pro se pleadings)
Rude v. Cook Inlet Region, Inc. (4/11/2014) sp-6887
[Attorneys and Judges] (Rule 68 offers must be in good faith)
[Business, Commercial/Labor Law] (cumulative voting of shareholder proxies)
[Procedure, Appellate] (mootness doctrine, exceptions)
[Procedure, Civil] (Rule 68 offers must be in good faith)
In Re Necessity for the Hospitalization of Gabriel C. (4/4/2014) sp-6886
[Constitutional] (due process violation must show prejudice)
[Procedure, Appellate] (mootness doctrine; exceptions)
Espeland v. OneWest Bank, FSB (3/28/2014) sp-6885
[Procedure, Civil] (Rule 60(b)(3), fraud; Rule 56, need affidavits to avoid summary judgment)
Zamarello v. Reges (3/28/2014) sp-6884
[Contracts] (ambiguous contract, integration clause)
Municipality of Anchorage v. Holleman (3/28/2014) sp-6883
[Constitutional] (voter referendum)
[Municipal Corporations] (voter referendum)
Shumway v. Betty Black Living Trust (3/28/2014) sp-6882
[Evidence] (Alaska resident, incarcerated elsewhere)
[Statutory Construction] (Alaska resident, incarcerated elsewhere)
Rowan B. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services (3/21/2014) sp-6881
[Family Law] (discovery in CINA cases; “substantial risk of sexual abuse”)
Maness v. Gordon (3/21/2014) sp-6880
[Constitutional] (due process, important vs. fundamental right)
[Torts] (statute of limitations, discovery rule, repressed memory syndrome)
Alaska Community Action on Toxics v. Hartig (3/21/2014) sp-6879
[Administrative Agencies] (pay for copyvg of agency records)
[Procedure, Appellate] (mootness doctrine)
Dennis v. State, Dept. of Administration, Division of Motor Vehicles (3/21/2014) sp-6878
[Criminal] (calibration tests for breath test instruments)
Molly O. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services (3/14/2014) sp-6877
[Family Law] (“Indian custodian” under ICWA)
Harris v. M-K Rivers (3/14/2014) sp-6876
[Workers' Compensation] (penalty for bad faith controversion)
Limeres v. Limeres (3/14/2014) sp-6875
[Family Law] (defer to trial judge on custody; income averaging for support order; supervised visitation, valuing marital property)
ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. v. Williams Alaska Petroleum, Inc. (3/14/2014) sp-6874
[Attorneys and Judges] (late-filed motions for fees and costs)
[Contracts] (no mirror image rule under the UCC)
Szabo v. Municipality of Anchorage (3/7/2014) sp-6873
[Procedure, Civil] (Guidelines for Rule 60(b)(1),(4),(5), and (6))
James R. v. Kylie R. (3/7/2014) sp-6872
[Family Law] (defer to superior court in custody matters; decision when both parents are equal; use of statutory guidelines)
Conitz v. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights (3/7/2014) sp-6871
[Procedure, Appellate] (time to appeal after reconsideration motion)
[Procedure, Civil] (res judicata; mootness)
Simone H. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services (3/7/2014) sp-6870
[Evidence] (Rule 504, psychotherapist privilege)
Stephanie W. v. Maxwell V. (2/28/2014) sp-6869
[Family Law] (general rules re: defer to trial court in custody decisions; good-faith allegations re: parental misconduct)
Christianson v. Conrad-Houston Insurance (2/21/2014) sp-6868, 318 P3d 390
[Contracts] (K limitations statute; discovery rule, malpractice)
[Procedure, Civil] (K limitations statute; discovery rule, malpractice)
[Torts] (K limitations statute; discovery rule, malpractice)
McAlpine v. Priddle (2/21/2014) sp-6866
[Attorneys and Judges] (fee arbitration issues not reviewable)
BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc. v. State, Dept. of Revenue (2/19/2014) sp-6867
[Administrative Agencies] (assess property tax, Alaska Pipeline)
[Municipal Corporations] (assess property tax, Alaska Pipeline)
Denali Citizens Council v. State, Dept. of Natural Resources (2/14/2014) sp-6865, 318 P3d 380
[Administrative Agencies] (appeal involving agency expertise)
[Procedure, Appellate] (appeal involving agency expertise)
Sagers v. Sackinger (2/14/2014) sp-6864, 318 P3d 860
[Family Law] (custody issue, trial court discretion)
[Procedure, Civil] (continuance, trial court has discretion; can’t disqualify judge based on adverse rulings)
Coppe v. Bleicher (2/14/2014) sp-6863, 318 P3d 369
[Procedure, Appellate] (pro se waiver of issue not briefed or raised below)
[Workers' Compensation] (conflicting medical testimony, defer to Board; pro se waiver of issue not briefed or raised below)
In Re Necessity for the Hospitalization of Daniel G. (2/7/2014) sp-6862
[Administrative Agencies] (ex parte psychiatric evaluation order)
[Procedure, Civil] (Mootness doctrine, 2 exceptions)
Welton v. State, Dept. of Corrections (1/3/2014) sp-6861, 315 P3d 1196
[Procedure, Appellate] (No appeal from a DOC administrative decision, 3 exceptions)

Bright Solutions Inc. in conjunction with Touch N' Go Systems, Inc. and The Law Offices of James B. Gottstein are pleased to present Alaska Supreme Court Opinions. For more legal resources, visit the The Alaska Legal Resource Center.

These Opinions were automatically converted to HTML (Hyper-Text Markup Language) format from electronic files provided by the Alaska Court System. Every effort has been made to ensure their accuracy, but neither Bright Solutions Inc.,  Touch N' Go Systems, Inc., The Alaska Legal Resource Center, nor the Law Offices of James B. Gottstein are responsible for their accuracy or for any damages arising out of any possible inaccuracy. If any mistakes are found, please let us know - E-Mail Us or otherwise contact Bright Solutions Inc.

Advertising space is available here and on related sites. E-mail E-Mail Us or otherwise contact Bright Solutions Inc.

Bright Solutions is a team of bright, friendly people who specialize in preventing and resolving computer problems, data recovery and computer forensics. Their services have proven invaluable to many individuals, utility companies, medical and legal offices, corporations, government entities and professional offices all over the nation.

Touch N' Go Systems is a Windows and Windows NT consulting and software development Company, specializing in:

• Windows and Windows NT environments, including networks.
• Trouble shooting
• Preparation of World-Wide-Web Hypertext documents (Home Pages, etc.)
• Scanning Services

Return to Touch N' Go Systems, Inc. Home Page.

Copyright 1995-4/20/2014 by Touch N' Go Systems, Inc. No copyright claim is made to the text of the Opinions.

Last Modified 4/20/2014