search the entire site.
or go to the recent opinions, or the chronological or subject indices.
Stevens, Allakeket and Dinyea v. Dept. of Natural Resources (3/29/91), 808 P 2d 261
Notice: This is subject to formal correction before
publication in the Pacific Reporter. Readers are
requested to bring typographical or other formal errors
to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts,
303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, in order that
corrections may be made prior to permanent publication.
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA
NATIVE VILLAGE OF STEVENS; )
NATIVE VILLAGE OF ALLAKAKET; ) Supreme Court No. S-4023
DINYEA CORPORATION, )
) Trial Court No.
Appellants, ) 4FA-89-0571 Civil
v. ) O P I N I O N
LENNIE GORSUCH, COMMISSIONER; )
JERRY L. BROSSIA, REGIONAL ) [No. 3678 - March 29, 1991]
MANAGER; and ALASKA DEPART- )
MENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, )
Appeal from the Superior Court of the
State of Alaska, Fourth Judicial District,
Richard D. Savell, Judge.
Appearances: Eric Smith, Anchorage, for
Appellants. Cameron M. Leonard, Assistant
Attorney General, Fairbanks, Douglas B.
Baily, Attorney General, Juneau, for
Before: Rabinowitz, Chief Justice,
Burke, Matthews, Compton, and Moore,
The judgment is affirmed on the memorandum decision of
the superior court appended hereto.1
1 The only point on appeal not covered in the memorandum
decision concerns the appellees' motion to strike. This point
lacks legal significance because the exhibit stricken would not
have changed the result of the litigation had it been considered.