Copyright 1995-1999 Touch N' Go Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. No claim made to official government works.
(a) Conduct of Hearing. Adoption hearings are confidential proceedings tried by the court without a jury and must be conducted pursuant to AS 25.23.150(a).
(b) Exclusion of Witnesses. Witnesses may be excluded from a hearing pursuant to Evidence Rule 615.
(c) Telephonic Participation. The court may conduct any hearing with telephonic participation as provided by Civil Rule 99, except as provided by Adoption Rule 9(f). Payment of telephone costs is governed by Administrative Rule 48.
(d) Testimony Under Oath. All testimony must be given under oath or affirmation as required by Evidence Rule 603.
(e) Contested Adoptions. The court may issue a pretrial order when the parties contest any issue. The court shall consider the advisability of appointing a guardian ad litem in contested adoptions.
(f) Burden and Standard of Proof. The burden is on the petitioner to prove all relevant issues in the adoption. The standard of proof as to the finding that the adoption is in the best interests of the person to be adopted is by a preponderance of the evidence. The standard of proof as to a finding that a consent is not required under AS 25.23.050(a) is by clear and convincing evidence.
In an adoption involving an Indian child, the burden of proof is also on the petitioner to show by a preponderance of the evidence that the placement is within the placement preferences or that there is good cause for allowing a non-preferred placement pursuant to 25 U.S.C. Section 1915. The burden and standard of proof in proceedings for the involuntary termination of parental rights in conjunction with adoption proceedings must comply with CINA Rule 18.
(g) Representation by Non-Attorney. Unless the court for good cause requires representation by an attorney, an Indian tribe may be represented by a non-attorney tribal member or tribal employee. A written authorization for representation by the non-attorney must be filed in the case before the non-attorney tribal member or tribal employee may represent the tribe. A guardian ad litem need not be represented by an attorney unless the court, for good cause, requires representation by an attorney.
(SCO 972 effective January 15, 1990; amended by SCO 998 effective January 15, 1990)
These Court Rules were automatically converted to HTML (Hyper-Text Markup Language) format from electronic files provided by the Alaska Court System. Every effort has been made to ensure their accuracy, but neither Touch N' Go Systems, Inc., The Alaska Legal Resource Center, nor the Law Offices of James B. Gottstein are responsible for their accuracy or for any damages arising out of any possible inaccuracy. If any mistakes are found, please let us know at one of the addresses listed below.
Return to Touch N' Go Systems, Inc. Home Page.
Copyright 1995-1999 by Touch N' Go Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. No copyright claim is made to the text of the rules.
Last Modified 7/14/1999
