Made available by Touch N' Go Systems, Inc., and the
Law Offices of James B. Gottstein.

You can also go to The Alaska Legal Resource Center or search the entire website search.

Touch N' Go,® the DeskTop In-and-Out Board makes your office run smoother. Visit Touch N' Go's Website to see how.
Title 22 . Department of Corrections
Chapter 5 . Sex Offender Treatment Providers
Section 455. Rules of evidence in disciplinary hearings; lesser included infractions

22 AAC 05.455. Rules of evidence in disciplinary hearings; lesser included infractions

(a) A prisoner is presumed innocent of an infraction, and the facility has the burden of establishing guilt. A prisoner cannot be found guilty of an alleged infraction unless the hearing officer or a majority of the disciplinary committee, as applicable, is convinced from the evidence presented at the hearing that the prisoner's guilt is established by a preponderance of the evidence. The decision in the adjudicative phase of the hearing must be based only on evidence presented at the hearing. If a prisoner does not request the presence of the facility staff member who wrote the disciplinary report, the report may be considered as evidence by the disciplinary tribunal and alone may serve as the basis for a decision. Other hearsay evidence may be considered if it appears to be reliable. The decision in the dispositive phase of the hearing may be based on evidence presented at the hearing or contained in the prisoner's case record.

(b) If the disciplinary tribunal is not convinced from the evidence presented at the hearing that the prisoner is guilty of committing the infraction charged, the prisoner may be found guilty of a lesser infraction necessarily included in the infraction charged if the evidence presented at the hearing establishes the prisoner's guilt by a preponderance of the evidence.

(c) For purposes of this section, a lesser infraction is necessarily included in the infraction charged if (1) the lesser infraction is inherently related to the infraction charged, so that proof of the greater would ordinarily entail proof of the lesser, (2) the infraction charged requires the disciplinary tribunal to find a disputed fact that is not required for conviction of the lesser infraction, and (3) the evidence relied on by the disciplinary tribunal supports conviction of the lesser infraction.

History: Eff. 9/10/77, Register 63; am 1/9/87, Register 101; am 11/13/99, Register 152

Authority: AS 33.20.050

AS 33.30.011

AS 33.30.021

AS 44.28.030


Note to HTML Version:

The Alaska Administrative Code was automatically converted to HTML from a plain text format. Every effort has been made to ensure its accuracy, but neither Touch N' Go Systems nor the Law Offices of James B. Gottstein can be held responsible for any possible errors. This version of the Alaska Administrative Code is current through June, 2006.

If it is critical that the precise terms of the Alaska Administrative Code be known, it is recommended that more formal sources be consulted. Recent editions of the Alaska Administrative Journal may be obtained from the Alaska Lieutenant Governor's Office on the world wide web. If any errors are found, please e-mail Touch N' Go systems at E-mail. We hope you find this information useful. Copyright 2006. Touch N' Go Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Last modified 7/05/2006