Made available by
Touch N' Go Systems, Inc., and the
Law Offices of James B. Gottstein.
You can also go to The Alaska Legal Resource Center or search the entire website search.
(a) The Corporation will, in its discretion, initiate a proposed debarment of a grantee, prospective grantee or other person associated with a grant by providing written notice sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the last known address of the grantee, prospective grantee or other person. The notice must inform the respondent of the reasons for the proposed debarment.
(b) Debarment may be imposed for:
(1) Conviction of or a civil judgment for:
(A) Commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public or private agreement or transaction;
(B) Commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, receiving stolen property, making false claims, or obstruction of justice;
(C) Commission of any other offense indicating a lack of business integrity or business honesty that seriously and directly affects the present responsibility of a person.
(2) Violation of the terms of a public agreement or transaction so serious as to affect the integrity of an agency such as:
(A) A willful failure to perform in accordance with the terms of one or more public agreements or transactions;
(B) A history of failure to perform or of unsatisfactory performance of one or more public agreements or transactions; or
(C) A willful violation of a statutory or regulatory provision or requirement applicable to a public agreement or transaction.
(3) Any one of the following:
(A) Debarment by a federal agency or another state agency;
(B) Knowingly doing business with a debarred person in connection with the performance of a Corporation grant or contract;
(C) Failure to pay a single substantial debt, or a number of outstanding debts (including disallowed grant costs and overpayments) owed to any state agency, provided that the debt is uncontested by the debtor or, if contested, provided that the debtor's legal and administrative remedies have been exhausted; or
(D) Any other cause so serious or compelling in nature that it affects the present responsibility of the respondent.
(4) For the purposes of determining grounds for debarment, the conduct of any officer, director, shareholder, partner, employee or other individual associated with a respondent may be imputed to the respondent when the conduct occurred in connection with the individual's performance of duties for or on behalf of the respondent or with the respondent's knowledge, approval or acquiescence. The respondent's acceptance of the benefits derived from the conduct shall be evidence of such knowledge, approval or acquiescence. The conduct of a respondent may be imputed to any officer, director, shareholder, partner, employee or other individual associated with the respondent who participated in, knew of or had reason to know of the respondent's conduct.
(c) A respondent may contest the proposed debarment by filing a response with the Corporation within 15 days of receipt of the notice. The response must contain information and argument in opposition to the proposed debarment, including identification of disputed material facts. If the respondent fails to file a timely response, the Corporation will, in its discretion, notify the respondent that the respondent is debarred.
(d) If a respondent files a timely response contesting the proposed debarment and requests a hearing, the chief procurement officer will appoint a Corporation employee from outside the department proposing the debarment to act as a hearing officer and issue a decision on the proposed debarment. If the hearing officer finds that the respondent's submission in opposition raised a genuine dispute over facts material to the proposed debarment, the respondent shall be afforded an opportunity to appear with a representative, submit documentary evidence, present witnesses, and confront any witness the Corporation presents.
(e) The hearing officer shall issue a decision on the proposed debarment on the basis of all the information in the administrative record. If the hearing officer decides to impose debarment, the decision must include findings regarding disputed material facts, the reasons for the debarment and the period of debarment including the effective dates. Debarment shall be for a period commensurate with the seriousness of the grounds for debarment.
(f) A debarment decision takes effect upon the issuance of a written decision. After the debarment decision takes effect, the respondent remains debarred and may not be awarded a Corporation grant until a court or the Corporation orders otherwise, or until the debarment period specified in the decision expires. Any existing Corporation grant shall be terminated. If the respondent who has been disbarred is an individual, the individual is debarred from participating in a Corporation grant as a principal, officer, director, employee or contractor of a grantee.
History: Eff. 9/23/97, Register 145
Authority: AS 18.55.100
Note to HTML Version:
The Alaska Administrative Code was automatically converted to HTML from a plain text format. Every effort has been made to ensure its accuracy, but neither Touch N' Go Systems nor the Law Offices of James B. Gottstein can be held responsible for any possible errors. This version of the Alaska Administrative Code is current through June, 2006.
If it is critical that the precise terms of the Alaska Administrative Code be known, it is recommended that more formal sources be consulted. Recent editions of the Alaska Administrative Journal may be obtained from the Alaska Lieutenant Governor's Office on the world wide web. If any errors are found, please e-mail Touch N' Go systems at E-mail. We hope you find this information useful. Copyright 2006. Touch N' Go Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Last modified 7/05/2006